ZIP 57536 Property Distress & Foreclosure Data
Hughes County, South Dakota's ZIP 57536 registers 13/100 composite distress, which DLRadar reads as minimal. The most distinctive pressure shows up in construction/permit lag (100/100), structural risk (32/100), mortgage stress (3/100). mortgage stress (3/100) and institutional ownership (3/100) stay muted. Structural risk reads 32/100 against active distress of 1/100.
Prices here sit in a peak phase: values rose 3.9% over the trailing year, at 23/100 phase confidence. At a peak the opportunity is selective — specific stressed parcels, not a broad discount.
278 residents call 57536 home, typically aged 43. 60% of housing is owner-occupied. Rent burden reaches 21% of tenant households. The poverty rate is 5.8% — low. The typical home is worth about $90,000 (2.3× income, relatively affordable). At $60,625, median income runs below typical U.S. levels. Vacancy runs 37.2%, above the national norm and a classic distress-and-opportunity signal. There are about 255 housing units across 57536. The demographic-stress sub-score lands at 27/100. Around 29% of adults hold a bachelor's degree or higher.
Taken together, 57536 profiles as an active-distress market where motivated-seller and below-market acquisitions concentrate. Every signal above traces to a verifiable public dataset, refreshed continuously and scored the same way in every ZIP nationwide.
Distress signal breakdown — ZIP 57536
Tax delinquency, institutional ownership, insurance pressure, NFIP/flood, construction lag, price dislocation and auction velocity — plus the 0 individual distressed properties (owner, address, APN, per-property score and exit read) are in the full DLRadar report.
Nearby ZIPs in Hughes County
Unlock the full ZIP 57536 acquisition report
Get every distressed property in 57536 with owner, address, APN, per-property distress score, bank exposure, exit-velocity read and a one-click funding + closing path. Nationwide, refreshed continuously.
Deterministic. Every signal traces to a public dataset · methodology