ZIP 49651 Property Distress & Foreclosure Data
Missaukee County, Michigan's ZIP 49651 registers 7/100 composite distress, which DLRadar reads as minimal. On the structural side it scores 17/100, with 2/100 of stress already active. The most distinctive pressure shows up in construction/permit lag (50/100), structural risk (17/100), mortgage stress (7/100). mortgage stress (7/100) and institutional ownership (3/100) stay muted.
Prices here sit in a expansion phase: values rose 5.6% over the trailing year, and 32% higher over three years (phase confidence 34/100). Even climbing markets leave specific parcels in distress; the scoring isolates them.
Households earn a median $61,524 — below the roughly $78,000 national figure. Around 34% of renters are cost-burdened. Roughly 11.6% live below the poverty line. The ZIP holds roughly 4,954 housing units. The tenure split is 85% owner-occupied to 15% rented. 7,540 residents call 49651 home, typically aged 48. About 19% have a four-year degree. A median home runs $171,100 here, or 2.7 times local income. On demographic stress specifically, 49651 scores 30/100. The vacancy rate is 39.5% — elevated.
Taken together, 49651 profiles as an active-distress market where motivated-seller and below-market acquisitions concentrate. Every signal above traces to a verifiable public dataset, refreshed continuously and scored the same way in every ZIP nationwide.
Distress signal breakdown — ZIP 49651
Tax delinquency, institutional ownership, insurance pressure, NFIP/flood, construction lag, price dislocation and auction velocity — plus the 0 individual distressed properties (owner, address, APN, per-property score and exit read) are in the full DLRadar report.
Nearby ZIPs in Missaukee County
Unlock the full ZIP 49651 acquisition report
Get every distressed property in 49651 with owner, address, APN, per-property distress score, bank exposure, exit-velocity read and a one-click funding + closing path. Nationwide, refreshed continuously.
Deterministic. Every signal traces to a public dataset · methodology